Alan Wilson could be described as the modern turbulent
priest. He has been the most outspoken Church of England bishop on the subject
of same sex relationships. Thus it is no surprise that this book on one level
is a polemic directed at those who would seek to maintain a status quo in which
a gay clergyman may live with his partner but not marry him. However, it is
certainly not a book filled with hyper-bole. There is a clear, well reasoned
argument put forward in this book as to why the Church of England should accept
same-sex marriage and allow gay clergy to marry as well as letting those
priests who wish to do so marry same sex couples.
There are distinct elements to the book which guide the
reader through a well constructed argument. Within the introduction he explains
how he got to the stage of feeling that he had to come off the fence and speak
out. Whilst he does not at any point say he felt he had to be the one to say
the emperor has no clothes that is the implicit message within this text. What
he does say explicitly is that he feels the legalisation of same sex marriage
spells the end of the "don't ask, don't say" culture.
Whilst odd references are made to other denominations the
book is unashamedly Anglican, reflecting the conversation it is seeking to
specifically engage with. The first main chapter guides you through the recent
history of the Church of England on LGBTQI issues touching on how wider
societal issues weave into the story. There is a brief, interesting, reflection
on how the Church of England initially reacted to the AIDS crisis which is an
example of the type of useful anecdote which Bishop Alan can provide as a CofE
insider who has over 30 years experience of public ministry including a decade
as a bishop. This status as an institutional outsider gives him an authorative
voice when he suggests that "by 2014 there were said to be a dozen or so
gay bishops." He has made clear on social media and elsewhere that he does
not believe that these bishops should be outed and I am glad for that. The book
underlines that he understands a lot about the difficulties and pain these men,
his colleagues, are wrestling with being based in the institution which is the
Church of England.
Within his discussion of what is regarded as unnatural by
some and explanation of why he disagrees with those views he relies strongly on
reason. Within this part of the book he refers to sex and gender bringing in
trans issues in a way which challenges the reader to think through the issues
which exist and way they touch upon each other. It is in this part of the book
he introduces his "Janet and John" description of the world many opponents
are inhabiting, have inhabited. There are various statistics thrown in to back
up his arguments which make interesting asides to think about.
The chapter on equality is perhaps the most bitter of the
book and is certainly one where the humour becomes almost caustic. Wilson
clearly feels alot of frustration.
Whilst many will be familiar with the biblical debate it
is important to cover it in a book such as this and Wilson does this in a way
which hits just the right tone. The discussion of biblical material covers
three distinct chapters the final of which explores biblical marriage. This I
would argue is the strongest part of the book as the bishop moves away from
points scoring and on to clearly guiding the reader through the relevant
biblical passages.
History is clearly a passion of the author and as he
guides us through the history of Christian marriage it felt as if you were
watching a BBC Four documentary, (and not just because at least one of the
examples had also been used in a recent history programme I had watched).
The differing views in different parts of the world and
in turn different parts of the Anglican Communion has been something many
critics of gay people getting married has focused upon. Wilson explores this
mixing contemporary statistics with historical understanding to give a
commanding case.
The book ends by summing up the reality of the situation
we now live in and in doing so sums up his convincing argument.
The book which is very readable builds up a specific
argument intended to contribute to a specific debate and is carefully crafted
on this basis. It therefore concentrates on the Church of England with minimal
mention of other groups. Yet I believe this is a significant weakness in some
ways. Within Bishop Alan's diocese lies one of the most ecumenical areas in the
country and so he is well aware of the negotiations and discussions which apply
to an increasing number of areas which contain LEP's and churches where the
CofE is one of a number of partners. The law is framed in such a way that what
is happening in the CofE does impact upon other denominations. This is
something I believe could have been further explored, looking at where the
development of CofE policy differs from other denominations not just the
current point.
Additionally whilst he touches upon the way in which
these debates are important in relation to mission he fails to really develop
this. Thus, I think the 172 page book could do with about another 40 pages.
Would I recommend it? Yes, definitely. Whatever your
views it is useful to be guided through the arguments involved and this
material does provide some food for thought even to those who are very familiar
with the debate.
More Perfect Union? Is published by Darton, Longman and Todd.
The ISBN is 978--0232-53125-1.
Thanks Sally for you understanding. Sorry not to say more about other churches but they were formulating policy when I was writing. It does seem to me Methodists and Baptists have been much more honest: owned up there are different views and given local church some discretion. Particularly admire Quakers for their integrity and care in discerning this since 1964. Why don't Anglicans take Free Church witness's more seriously? It's way ahead on thus...
ReplyDeleteThanks Alan. That makes sense as to why the Anglicans don't take Free Churches or the new church groups more seriously think the answer to that one is touched on in the part of the book which outlines the history of marriage and divorce and the way in which the CofE has tried to maintain power, particularly after the restoration. Historic ways of thinking and working to protect a privileged position have echoed down..........
ReplyDelete