The role of the laity seems to be coming, finally, into
sharper focus. One example which exemplifies this is WATCH who are advertising
several events aimed at exploring this theme including one which is only for
lay women. These invents include a free one entitled Rediscovering the Laity - a day with Prof Elaine Graham in Birmingham on 3rd May. This is something I applaud and welcome.
For too long the discussions and arguments have focused on
the hierarchy and women gaining access to that. Now, I don’t want to lessen the
importance of that fight but I do want to highlight some of the things which
that has allowed to go unchallenged.
The increasing growth of women in the church working a
quadruple shift where they have been seeking to balance not only work, caring
responsibilities and housework but also church responsibilities too. The growth
of this quadruple shift has not been noticed, I would argue, because the
institution to some extent has held onto the model and ideal of nuclear family
where the husband took the instrumental role of breadwinner and the wife the
expressive role of caregiver.
There is one area where I think the impact and contribution
of this quadruple shift needs to be particularly noted and that is with the
growth and leadership of Messy Church. The 2013 Church Growth Study data (strand 3b) showed
that 75% of Messy Church initiatives were led by women. At the same time the
study showed that 67.7% of women who were involved in leading Fresh Expressions
(including Messy Church) did so in their “spare time” compared to 32.3% of men.
Whilst this is great I do wonder, in an age when we are
becoming increasingly aware of the need for clergy to take regular time off to
avoid burn out, whether we are ignoring the wellbeing of many women (and lay
men) in our congregations. The reason I focus on women is because
disproportionately they are likely to be women because they are more likely to
be within our churches (as this recent PEW research on The Gender Gap in Religion Around the World yet again highlights).
My own research, a few years ago now, was into single parents
in evangelical churches. This noted how as most single parents with caring
responsibilities are women for their situation to be noted and the issues of invisibility
around them to be met there needs to be a focus more upon the laity. In
addition to single parents I believe this kind of focus may also help carers,
who are also more likely to be women.
For this to happen though there needs to be both a focus on
the contribution of the laity but also the demands and issues outside church
which the laity, particularly, face and which often have an invisibility within
church. I am not so certain the latter will happen.
The reason for my concern that this new focus on the laity
will not be as positive as it might be is twofold. The first reason is that I
am not sure what the agenda behind this focus is. Is it a real concern for the
laity or is looking in an age of increased cost-cutting in churches at how the
resource of the laity are being and may be better harnessed and used?
The second reason for my concern is that I worry this push
for the recognition of lay women may be coming for an academic or professional
elite whose privilege means they are seeking for their “professional”
contribution to be recognised.
Now I hope I am wrong, but perhaps I have been around the
church too long and so am naturally cynical when I should be hopeful. I
understand the system of gatekeeping which exists and who has the entry in the
first place to get these types of discussions on the table.
The other reason for my cynicism is the fact I know it is
often voices, such as my own, who use their DM’s to kick at doors asking for
the recognition of the contribution of the laity.
I have done it a lot over the last few months as a lay
chaplain. I am a member of the laity who has entered the “professional” world.
I am there asking for my place as a professional to be recognised when people
are saying that through initiatives like Chaplaincy Everywhere the role of lay chaplains
as “part-timers” or more often “volunteers” is being recognised and valued by
the church. I am there saying, yes and so it should be BUT for some of us lay
ministry is our vocation and professional career and we want to be recognised
on an equal basis to ordained people doing similar roles. We are not the same in one sense because we have taken a different route into this work
but we want parity of esteem to exist and our training, experience, calling and
the actual work we do to be acknowledged appropriately.
However, as we live in resurrection hope I am going to try
and be less cynical and end by celebrating the signs of new life and the new
recognition of lay people which is taking place this spring.
When I was a nurse, candidating for ordained ministry, my (very nice) superintendent said to me, 'gosh it will be a change for you, being in ministry.' I replied that I'd been in ministry for years - in shop work, in a pre-school, in a nursing home, and more recently as a nurse, speaking to people who might never be seen by a 'church person' or chaplain... We do believe in the 'ministry of the whole people of God' and need to take it as seriously as God does. For the record, I happen to know that your own ministry is very much valued in the church you are part of.
ReplyDeleteIndeed & thank you for Las bit.
ReplyDelete